Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Interactive Brokers

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Interactive Brokers at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Interactive Brokers into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Group and Interactive Brokers Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Interactive Brokers and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Interactive Brokers. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Interactive Brokers.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Interactive Brokers

0.94

Correlation Coefficient

Goldman Sachs  Interactive Brokers

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Interactive is 0.94. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Group and Interactive Brokers Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Interactive Brokers and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Group are associated (or correlated) with Interactive Brokers. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Interactive Brokers has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Interactive Brokers go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Interactive Brokers

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Goldman Sachs Group is expected to generate 0.59 times more return on investment than Interactive Brokers. However, Goldman Sachs Group is 1.69 times less risky than Interactive Brokers. It trades about -0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Interactive Brokers Group is currently generating about -0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  57,072  in Goldman Sachs Group on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (2,760) from holding Goldman Sachs Group or give up 4.84% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Strong
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Goldman Sachs Group  vs.  Interactive Brokers Group

Goldman Sachs Group

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Interactive Brokers

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Interactive Brokers Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with relatively invariable forward-looking signals, Interactive Brokers is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Interactive Brokers

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Interactive Brokers positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Interactive Brokers can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Interactive Brokers will offset losses from the drop in Interactive Brokers' long position.

The idea behind Goldman Sachs Group and Interactive Brokers Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Premium Stories module to follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope.