Correlation Between GOLDMAN SACHS and Maple Leaf

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GOLDMAN SACHS and Maple Leaf at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GOLDMAN SACHS and Maple Leaf into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between GOLDMAN SACHS CDR and Maple Leaf Foods, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GOLDMAN SACHS and Maple Leaf and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GOLDMAN SACHS with a short position of Maple Leaf. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GOLDMAN SACHS and Maple Leaf.

Diversification Opportunities for GOLDMAN SACHS and Maple Leaf

-0.32
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between GOLDMAN and Maple is -0.32. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding GOLDMAN SACHS CDR and Maple Leaf Foods in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Maple Leaf Foods and GOLDMAN SACHS is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on GOLDMAN SACHS CDR are associated (or correlated) with Maple Leaf. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Maple Leaf Foods has no effect on the direction of GOLDMAN SACHS i.e., GOLDMAN SACHS and Maple Leaf go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GOLDMAN SACHS and Maple Leaf

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon GOLDMAN SACHS is expected to generate 743.8 times less return on investment than Maple Leaf. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, GOLDMAN SACHS CDR is 1.07 times less risky than Maple Leaf. It trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Maple Leaf Foods is currently generating about 0.17 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,013  in Maple Leaf Foods on December 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  479.00  from holding Maple Leaf Foods or generate 23.8% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

GOLDMAN SACHS CDR  vs.  Maple Leaf Foods

 Performance 
       Timeline  
GOLDMAN SACHS CDR 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days GOLDMAN SACHS CDR has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, GOLDMAN SACHS is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Maple Leaf Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Maple Leaf Foods are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating forward indicators, Maple Leaf displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

GOLDMAN SACHS and Maple Leaf Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GOLDMAN SACHS and Maple Leaf

The main advantage of trading using opposite GOLDMAN SACHS and Maple Leaf positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GOLDMAN SACHS position performs unexpectedly, Maple Leaf can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Maple Leaf will offset losses from the drop in Maple Leaf's long position.
The idea behind GOLDMAN SACHS CDR and Maple Leaf Foods pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the USA ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA.

Other Complementary Tools

Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk