Correlation Between GOLDMAN SACHS and Maple Leaf
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GOLDMAN SACHS and Maple Leaf at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GOLDMAN SACHS and Maple Leaf into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between GOLDMAN SACHS CDR and Maple Leaf Foods, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GOLDMAN SACHS and Maple Leaf and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GOLDMAN SACHS with a short position of Maple Leaf. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GOLDMAN SACHS and Maple Leaf.
Diversification Opportunities for GOLDMAN SACHS and Maple Leaf
-0.32 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very good diversification
The 3 months correlation between GOLDMAN and Maple is -0.32. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding GOLDMAN SACHS CDR and Maple Leaf Foods in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Maple Leaf Foods and GOLDMAN SACHS is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on GOLDMAN SACHS CDR are associated (or correlated) with Maple Leaf. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Maple Leaf Foods has no effect on the direction of GOLDMAN SACHS i.e., GOLDMAN SACHS and Maple Leaf go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between GOLDMAN SACHS and Maple Leaf
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon GOLDMAN SACHS is expected to generate 743.8 times less return on investment than Maple Leaf. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, GOLDMAN SACHS CDR is 1.07 times less risky than Maple Leaf. It trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Maple Leaf Foods is currently generating about 0.17 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 2,013 in Maple Leaf Foods on December 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 479.00 from holding Maple Leaf Foods or generate 23.8% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
GOLDMAN SACHS CDR vs. Maple Leaf Foods
Performance |
Timeline |
GOLDMAN SACHS CDR |
Maple Leaf Foods |
GOLDMAN SACHS and Maple Leaf Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with GOLDMAN SACHS and Maple Leaf
The main advantage of trading using opposite GOLDMAN SACHS and Maple Leaf positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GOLDMAN SACHS position performs unexpectedly, Maple Leaf can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Maple Leaf will offset losses from the drop in Maple Leaf's long position.GOLDMAN SACHS vs. Titan Mining Corp | GOLDMAN SACHS vs. GoldQuest Mining Corp | GOLDMAN SACHS vs. Magna Mining | GOLDMAN SACHS vs. Nicola Mining |
Maple Leaf vs. Saputo Inc | Maple Leaf vs. George Weston Limited | Maple Leaf vs. Empire Company Limited | Maple Leaf vs. Premium Brands Holdings |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the USA ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA.
Other Complementary Tools
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
USA ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA | |
Bollinger Bands Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon | |
Earnings Calls Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges | |
Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk |