Correlation Between GOLDMAN SACHS and Bank of America

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GOLDMAN SACHS and Bank of America at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GOLDMAN SACHS and Bank of America into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between GOLDMAN SACHS CDR and Bank of America, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GOLDMAN SACHS and Bank of America and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GOLDMAN SACHS with a short position of Bank of America. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GOLDMAN SACHS and Bank of America.

Diversification Opportunities for GOLDMAN SACHS and Bank of America

0.84
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between GOLDMAN and Bank is 0.84. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding GOLDMAN SACHS CDR and Bank of America in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Bank of America and GOLDMAN SACHS is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on GOLDMAN SACHS CDR are associated (or correlated) with Bank of America. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Bank of America has no effect on the direction of GOLDMAN SACHS i.e., GOLDMAN SACHS and Bank of America go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GOLDMAN SACHS and Bank of America

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon GOLDMAN SACHS CDR is expected to generate 1.18 times more return on investment than Bank of America. However, GOLDMAN SACHS is 1.18 times more volatile than Bank of America. It trades about -0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Bank of America is currently generating about -0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,854  in GOLDMAN SACHS CDR on December 27, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (97.00) from holding GOLDMAN SACHS CDR or give up 3.4% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

GOLDMAN SACHS CDR  vs.  Bank of America

 Performance 
       Timeline  
GOLDMAN SACHS CDR 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days GOLDMAN SACHS CDR has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, GOLDMAN SACHS is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Bank of America has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Bank of America is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

GOLDMAN SACHS and Bank of America Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GOLDMAN SACHS and Bank of America

The main advantage of trading using opposite GOLDMAN SACHS and Bank of America positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GOLDMAN SACHS position performs unexpectedly, Bank of America can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Bank of America will offset losses from the drop in Bank of America's long position.
The idea behind GOLDMAN SACHS CDR and Bank of America pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Funds Screener module to find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges