Correlation Between GMS and UNITEDHEALTH
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between GMS Inc and UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GMS and UNITEDHEALTH and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GMS with a short position of UNITEDHEALTH. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GMS and UNITEDHEALTH.
Diversification Opportunities for GMS and UNITEDHEALTH
-0.04 | Correlation Coefficient |
Good diversification
The 3 months correlation between GMS and UNITEDHEALTH is -0.04. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding GMS Inc and UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC and GMS is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on GMS Inc are associated (or correlated) with UNITEDHEALTH. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC has no effect on the direction of GMS i.e., GMS and UNITEDHEALTH go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between GMS and UNITEDHEALTH
Considering the 90-day investment horizon GMS Inc is expected to under-perform the UNITEDHEALTH. In addition to that, GMS is 1.84 times more volatile than UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC. It trades about -0.12 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC is currently generating about 0.11 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 6,242 in UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC on December 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 420.00 from holding UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC or generate 6.73% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 98.36% |
Values | Daily Returns |
GMS Inc vs. UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC
Performance |
Timeline |
GMS Inc |
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC |
GMS and UNITEDHEALTH Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with GMS and UNITEDHEALTH
The main advantage of trading using opposite GMS and UNITEDHEALTH positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GMS position performs unexpectedly, UNITEDHEALTH can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in UNITEDHEALTH will offset losses from the drop in UNITEDHEALTH's long position.GMS vs. Quanex Building Products | GMS vs. Apogee Enterprises | GMS vs. Azek Company | GMS vs. Beacon Roofing Supply |
UNITEDHEALTH vs. Perseus Mining Limited | UNITEDHEALTH vs. Franklin Wireless Corp | UNITEDHEALTH vs. Denison Mines Corp | UNITEDHEALTH vs. Intuitive Surgical |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Efficient Frontier module to plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market..
Other Complementary Tools
Idea Optimizer Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio | |
Bond Analysis Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios. | |
Technical Analysis Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data | |
ETF Categories List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments | |
Global Correlations Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets |