Correlation Between GMS and KINDER
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between GMS Inc and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GMS and KINDER and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GMS with a short position of KINDER. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GMS and KINDER.
Diversification Opportunities for GMS and KINDER
Very weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between GMS and KINDER is 0.48. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding GMS Inc and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on KINDER MORGAN ENERGY and GMS is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on GMS Inc are associated (or correlated) with KINDER. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of KINDER MORGAN ENERGY has no effect on the direction of GMS i.e., GMS and KINDER go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between GMS and KINDER
Considering the 90-day investment horizon GMS Inc is expected to under-perform the KINDER. In addition to that, GMS is 3.5 times more volatile than KINDER MORGAN ENERGY. It trades about -0.25 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. KINDER MORGAN ENERGY is currently generating about -0.1 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 11,301 in KINDER MORGAN ENERGY on October 7, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (188.00) from holding KINDER MORGAN ENERGY or give up 1.66% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 95.12% |
Values | Daily Returns |
GMS Inc vs. KINDER MORGAN ENERGY
Performance |
Timeline |
GMS Inc |
KINDER MORGAN ENERGY |
GMS and KINDER Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with GMS and KINDER
The main advantage of trading using opposite GMS and KINDER positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GMS position performs unexpectedly, KINDER can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in KINDER will offset losses from the drop in KINDER's long position.GMS vs. Quanex Building Products | GMS vs. Apogee Enterprises | GMS vs. Azek Company | GMS vs. Beacon Roofing Supply |
KINDER vs. Coda Octopus Group | KINDER vs. Grupo Aeroportuario del | KINDER vs. AerSale Corp | KINDER vs. Pentair PLC |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Correlations module to find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets.
Other Complementary Tools
Companies Directory Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals | |
Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
Portfolio Anywhere Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device | |
Watchlist Optimization Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm | |
Earnings Calls Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges |