Correlation Between Gmo Global and Kensington Dynamic

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Gmo Global and Kensington Dynamic at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Gmo Global and Kensington Dynamic into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Gmo Global Equity and Kensington Dynamic Growth, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Gmo Global and Kensington Dynamic and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Gmo Global with a short position of Kensington Dynamic. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Gmo Global and Kensington Dynamic.

Diversification Opportunities for Gmo Global and Kensington Dynamic

0.17
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Gmo and Kensington is 0.17. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Gmo Global Equity and Kensington Dynamic Growth in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Kensington Dynamic Growth and Gmo Global is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Gmo Global Equity are associated (or correlated) with Kensington Dynamic. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Kensington Dynamic Growth has no effect on the direction of Gmo Global i.e., Gmo Global and Kensington Dynamic go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Gmo Global and Kensington Dynamic

Assuming the 90 days horizon Gmo Global Equity is expected to under-perform the Kensington Dynamic. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Gmo Global Equity is 1.05 times less risky than Kensington Dynamic. The mutual fund trades about -0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Kensington Dynamic Growth is currently generating about -0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,133  in Kensington Dynamic Growth on October 7, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (29.00) from holding Kensington Dynamic Growth or give up 2.56% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Gmo Global Equity  vs.  Kensington Dynamic Growth

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Gmo Global Equity 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Gmo Global Equity has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's fundamental indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.
Kensington Dynamic Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Kensington Dynamic Growth are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Kensington Dynamic is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Gmo Global and Kensington Dynamic Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Gmo Global and Kensington Dynamic

The main advantage of trading using opposite Gmo Global and Kensington Dynamic positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Gmo Global position performs unexpectedly, Kensington Dynamic can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Kensington Dynamic will offset losses from the drop in Kensington Dynamic's long position.
The idea behind Gmo Global Equity and Kensington Dynamic Growth pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pattern Recognition module to use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world