Correlation Between GM and Copper Lake

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Copper Lake at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Copper Lake into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Copper Lake Resources, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Copper Lake and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Copper Lake. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Copper Lake.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Copper Lake

-0.51
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Copper is -0.51. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Copper Lake Resources in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Copper Lake Resources and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Copper Lake. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Copper Lake Resources has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Copper Lake go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Copper Lake

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon GM is expected to generate 42.26 times less return on investment than Copper Lake. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, General Motors is 16.17 times less risky than Copper Lake. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Copper Lake Resources is currently generating about 0.1 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1.50  in Copper Lake Resources on September 22, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (1.35) from holding Copper Lake Resources or give up 90.0% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Copper Lake Resources

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating primary indicators, GM may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Copper Lake Resources 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Copper Lake Resources are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly unfluctuating basic indicators, Copper Lake reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

GM and Copper Lake Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Copper Lake

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Copper Lake positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Copper Lake can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Copper Lake will offset losses from the drop in Copper Lake's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Copper Lake Resources pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Exposure Probability module to analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets