Correlation Between GM and SAMMON
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and SAMMON 475 08 APR 32, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and SAMMON and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of SAMMON. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and SAMMON.
Diversification Opportunities for GM and SAMMON
Very weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between GM and SAMMON is 0.51. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and SAMMON 475 08 APR 32 in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on SAMMON 475 08 and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with SAMMON. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of SAMMON 475 08 has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and SAMMON go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between GM and SAMMON
Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 0.48 times more return on investment than SAMMON. However, General Motors is 2.07 times less risky than SAMMON. It trades about -0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. SAMMON 475 08 APR 32 is currently generating about -0.71 per unit of risk. If you would invest 5,538 in General Motors on September 28, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (187.00) from holding General Motors or give up 3.38% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 35.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
General Motors vs. SAMMON 475 08 APR 32
Performance |
Timeline |
General Motors |
SAMMON 475 08 |
GM and SAMMON Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with GM and SAMMON
The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and SAMMON positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, SAMMON can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in SAMMON will offset losses from the drop in SAMMON's long position.The idea behind General Motors and SAMMON 475 08 APR 32 pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamentals Comparison module to compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities.
Other Complementary Tools
Crypto Correlations Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins | |
Portfolio Comparator Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account | |
Stock Tickers Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites | |
USA ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA | |
Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated |