Correlation Between GM and KINDER

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and KINDER at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and KINDER into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and KINDER and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of KINDER. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and KINDER.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and KINDER

-0.5
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and KINDER is -0.5. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on KINDER MORGAN ENERGY and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with KINDER. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of KINDER MORGAN ENERGY has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and KINDER go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and KINDER

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon GM is expected to generate 45.0 times less return on investment than KINDER. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, General Motors is 36.22 times less risky than KINDER. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. KINDER MORGAN ENERGY is currently generating about 0.07 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  10,268  in KINDER MORGAN ENERGY on September 23, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  500.00  from holding KINDER MORGAN ENERGY or generate 4.87% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy72.64%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  KINDER MORGAN ENERGY

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak primary indicators, GM may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
KINDER MORGAN ENERGY 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days KINDER MORGAN ENERGY has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, KINDER is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

GM and KINDER Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and KINDER

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and KINDER positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, KINDER can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in KINDER will offset losses from the drop in KINDER's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities