Correlation Between GM and Parkland

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Parkland at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Parkland into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Parkland, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Parkland and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Parkland. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Parkland.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Parkland

-0.51
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Parkland is -0.51. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Parkland in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Parkland and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Parkland. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Parkland has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Parkland go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Parkland

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 0.46 times more return on investment than Parkland. However, General Motors is 2.18 times less risky than Parkland. It trades about -0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Parkland is currently generating about -0.08 per unit of risk. If you would invest  5,467  in General Motors on September 27, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (49.00) from holding General Motors or give up 0.9% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Parkland

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak primary indicators, GM displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Parkland 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Parkland has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest abnormal performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain stable and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-run gains for the company stockholders.

GM and Parkland Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Parkland

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Parkland positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Parkland can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Parkland will offset losses from the drop in Parkland's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Parkland pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sign In To Macroaxis module to sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules.

Other Complementary Tools

Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated