Correlation Between GM and Labyrinth Resources
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Labyrinth Resources at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Labyrinth Resources into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Labyrinth Resources Limited, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Labyrinth Resources and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Labyrinth Resources. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Labyrinth Resources.
Diversification Opportunities for GM and Labyrinth Resources
0.73 | Correlation Coefficient |
Poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between GM and Labyrinth is 0.73. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Labyrinth Resources Limited in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Labyrinth Resources and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Labyrinth Resources. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Labyrinth Resources has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Labyrinth Resources go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between GM and Labyrinth Resources
Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon GM is expected to generate 9.52 times less return on investment than Labyrinth Resources. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, General Motors is 2.34 times less risky than Labyrinth Resources. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Labyrinth Resources Limited is currently generating about 0.18 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 15.00 in Labyrinth Resources Limited on September 21, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 11.00 from holding Labyrinth Resources Limited or generate 73.33% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Significant |
Accuracy | 98.44% |
Values | Daily Returns |
General Motors vs. Labyrinth Resources Limited
Performance |
Timeline |
General Motors |
Labyrinth Resources |
GM and Labyrinth Resources Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with GM and Labyrinth Resources
The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Labyrinth Resources positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Labyrinth Resources can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Labyrinth Resources will offset losses from the drop in Labyrinth Resources' long position.The idea behind General Motors and Labyrinth Resources Limited pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.Labyrinth Resources vs. Northern Star Resources | Labyrinth Resources vs. Bluescope Steel | Labyrinth Resources vs. Sandfire Resources NL | Labyrinth Resources vs. De Grey Mining |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Analyzer module to analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas.
Other Complementary Tools
FinTech Suite Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities | |
Portfolio Center All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios | |
Options Analysis Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios | |
Pair Correlation Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments | |
Insider Screener Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance |