Correlation Between GM and Hunter Group

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Hunter Group at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Hunter Group into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Hunter Group ASA, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Hunter Group and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Hunter Group. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Hunter Group.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Hunter Group

-0.66
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Hunter is -0.66. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Hunter Group ASA in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Hunter Group ASA and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Hunter Group. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Hunter Group ASA has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Hunter Group go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Hunter Group

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 0.29 times more return on investment than Hunter Group. However, General Motors is 3.51 times less risky than Hunter Group. It trades about -0.14 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Hunter Group ASA is currently generating about -0.25 per unit of risk. If you would invest  5,753  in General Motors on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (479.00) from holding General Motors or give up 8.33% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy95.65%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Hunter Group ASA

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating primary indicators, GM displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Hunter Group ASA 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Hunter Group ASA has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite conflicting performance in the last few months, the Stock's essential indicators remain quite persistent which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The latest mess may also be a sign of long-standing up-swing for the company institutional investors.

GM and Hunter Group Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Hunter Group

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Hunter Group positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Hunter Group can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Hunter Group will offset losses from the drop in Hunter Group's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Hunter Group ASA pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the FinTech Suite module to use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets