Correlation Between GM and Power Assets

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Power Assets at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Power Assets into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Power Assets Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Power Assets and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Power Assets. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Power Assets.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Power Assets

0.51
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Power is 0.51. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Power Assets Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Power Assets Holdings and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Power Assets. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Power Assets Holdings has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Power Assets go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Power Assets

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to under-perform the Power Assets. In addition to that, GM is 3.02 times more volatile than Power Assets Holdings. It trades about -0.11 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Power Assets Holdings is currently generating about 0.21 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  615.00  in Power Assets Holdings on September 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  25.00  from holding Power Assets Holdings or generate 4.07% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Power Assets Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak primary indicators, GM may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Power Assets Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Power Assets Holdings are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Power Assets is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

GM and Power Assets Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Power Assets

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Power Assets positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Power Assets can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Power Assets will offset losses from the drop in Power Assets' long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Power Assets Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Backtesting module to avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account