Correlation Between GM and Foods Inns

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Foods Inns at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Foods Inns into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Foods Inns Limited, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Foods Inns and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Foods Inns. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Foods Inns.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Foods Inns

0.51
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Foods is 0.51. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Foods Inns Limited in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Foods Inns Limited and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Foods Inns. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Foods Inns Limited has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Foods Inns go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Foods Inns

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 0.64 times more return on investment than Foods Inns. However, General Motors is 1.55 times less risky than Foods Inns. It trades about -0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Foods Inns Limited is currently generating about -0.1 per unit of risk. If you would invest  5,352  in General Motors on December 28, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (684.00) from holding General Motors or give up 12.78% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Foods Inns Limited

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days General Motors has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest weak performance, the Stock's primary indicators remain healthy and the recent disarray on Wall Street may also be a sign of long period gains for the firm investors.
Foods Inns Limited 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Foods Inns Limited has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of inconsistent performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain very healthy which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The recent disarray may also be a sign of long period up-swing for the firm investors.

GM and Foods Inns Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Foods Inns

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Foods Inns positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Foods Inns can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Foods Inns will offset losses from the drop in Foods Inns' long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Foods Inns Limited pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Optimization module to compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences