Correlation Between GM and FORMA SA
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and FORMA SA at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and FORMA SA into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and FORMA SA BOTOSANI, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and FORMA SA and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of FORMA SA. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and FORMA SA.
Diversification Opportunities for GM and FORMA SA
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between GM and FORMA is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and FORMA SA BOTOSANI in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on FORMA SA BOTOSANI and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with FORMA SA. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of FORMA SA BOTOSANI has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and FORMA SA go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between GM and FORMA SA
If you would invest 3,568 in General Motors on October 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 1,417 from holding General Motors or generate 39.71% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Flat |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 0.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
General Motors vs. FORMA SA BOTOSANI
Performance |
Timeline |
General Motors |
FORMA SA BOTOSANI |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0 of 100
Weak | Strong |
Very Weak
GM and FORMA SA Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with GM and FORMA SA
The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and FORMA SA positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, FORMA SA can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in FORMA SA will offset losses from the drop in FORMA SA's long position.GM vs. Canoo Inc | GM vs. Aquagold International | GM vs. Morningstar Unconstrained Allocation | GM vs. Thrivent High Yield |
FORMA SA vs. IHUNT TECHNOLOGY IMPORT EXPORT | FORMA SA vs. Digi Communications NV | FORMA SA vs. AROBS TRANSILVANIA SOFTWARE | FORMA SA vs. TRANSILVANIA INVESTMENTS ALLIANCE |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the FinTech Suite module to use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities.
Other Complementary Tools
Portfolio Comparator Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account | |
Financial Widgets Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets | |
Commodity Directory Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges | |
My Watchlist Analysis Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like | |
Pair Correlation Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments |