Correlation Between GM and Electromedical Technologies

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Electromedical Technologies at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Electromedical Technologies into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Electromedical Technologies, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Electromedical Technologies and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Electromedical Technologies. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Electromedical Technologies.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Electromedical Technologies

-0.46
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Electromedical is -0.46. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Electromedical Technologies in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Electromedical Technologies and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Electromedical Technologies. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Electromedical Technologies has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Electromedical Technologies go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Electromedical Technologies

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon GM is expected to generate 3.36 times less return on investment than Electromedical Technologies. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, General Motors is 7.05 times less risky than Electromedical Technologies. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Electromedical Technologies is currently generating about 0.03 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  0.60  in Electromedical Technologies on September 23, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (0.57) from holding Electromedical Technologies or give up 95.0% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Electromedical Technologies

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak primary indicators, GM may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Electromedical Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Electromedical Technologies are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating technical and fundamental indicators, Electromedical Technologies exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

GM and Electromedical Technologies Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Electromedical Technologies

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Electromedical Technologies positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Electromedical Technologies can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Electromedical Technologies will offset losses from the drop in Electromedical Technologies' long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Electromedical Technologies pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios