Correlation Between GM and Community Health

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Community Health at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Community Health into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Community Health Systems, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Community Health and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Community Health. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Community Health.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Community Health

0.02
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Community is 0.02. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Community Health Systems in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Community Health Systems and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Community Health. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Community Health Systems has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Community Health go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Community Health

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 0.38 times more return on investment than Community Health. However, General Motors is 2.65 times less risky than Community Health. It trades about -0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Community Health Systems is currently generating about -0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,950  in General Motors on December 1, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (37.00) from holding General Motors or give up 0.75% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Community Health Systems

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days General Motors has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest weak performance, the Stock's primary indicators remain healthy and the recent disarray on Wall Street may also be a sign of long period gains for the firm investors.
Community Health Systems 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Community Health Systems has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest uncertain performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain strong and the recent confusion on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-lasting gains for the firm traders.

GM and Community Health Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Community Health

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Community Health positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Community Health can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Community Health will offset losses from the drop in Community Health's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Community Health Systems pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Odds Of Bankruptcy module to get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years.

Other Complementary Tools

Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated