Correlation Between GM and Context Therapeutics

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Context Therapeutics at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Context Therapeutics into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Context Therapeutics, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Context Therapeutics and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Context Therapeutics. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Context Therapeutics.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Context Therapeutics

-0.33
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Context is -0.33. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Context Therapeutics in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Context Therapeutics and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Context Therapeutics. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Context Therapeutics has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Context Therapeutics go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Context Therapeutics

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 0.67 times more return on investment than Context Therapeutics. However, General Motors is 1.5 times less risky than Context Therapeutics. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Context Therapeutics is currently generating about -0.22 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,927  in General Motors on September 17, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  297.00  from holding General Motors or generate 6.03% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy97.67%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Context Therapeutics

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak primary indicators, GM may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Context Therapeutics 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Context Therapeutics has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the company investors.

GM and Context Therapeutics Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Context Therapeutics

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Context Therapeutics positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Context Therapeutics can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Context Therapeutics will offset losses from the drop in Context Therapeutics' long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Context Therapeutics pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Analyzer module to analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance