Correlation Between GM and Contact Financial
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Contact Financial at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Contact Financial into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Contact Financial Holding, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Contact Financial and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Contact Financial. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Contact Financial.
Diversification Opportunities for GM and Contact Financial
0.52 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between GM and Contact is 0.52. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Contact Financial Holding in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Contact Financial Holding and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Contact Financial. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Contact Financial Holding has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Contact Financial go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between GM and Contact Financial
Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon GM is expected to generate 1.33 times less return on investment than Contact Financial. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, General Motors is 1.77 times less risky than Contact Financial. It trades about 0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Contact Financial Holding is currently generating about 0.06 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 420.00 in Contact Financial Holding on September 16, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 45.00 from holding Contact Financial Holding or generate 10.71% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 81.54% |
Values | Daily Returns |
General Motors vs. Contact Financial Holding
Performance |
Timeline |
General Motors |
Contact Financial Holding |
GM and Contact Financial Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with GM and Contact Financial
The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Contact Financial positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Contact Financial can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Contact Financial will offset losses from the drop in Contact Financial's long position.The idea behind General Motors and Contact Financial Holding pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.Contact Financial vs. Nile City Investment | Contact Financial vs. Sidi Kerir Petrochemicals | Contact Financial vs. International Agricultural Products | Contact Financial vs. Paint Chemicals Industries |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Manager module to state of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital.
Other Complementary Tools
Latest Portfolios Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios | |
Bond Analysis Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios. | |
Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
Investing Opportunities Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences |