Correlation Between GM and Concurrent Technologies

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Concurrent Technologies at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Concurrent Technologies into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Concurrent Technologies Plc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Concurrent Technologies and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Concurrent Technologies. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Concurrent Technologies.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Concurrent Technologies

-0.58
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Concurrent is -0.58. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Concurrent Technologies Plc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Concurrent Technologies and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Concurrent Technologies. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Concurrent Technologies has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Concurrent Technologies go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Concurrent Technologies

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to under-perform the Concurrent Technologies. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, General Motors is 1.17 times less risky than Concurrent Technologies. The stock trades about -0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Concurrent Technologies Plc is currently generating about 0.11 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  14,400  in Concurrent Technologies Plc on November 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,300  from holding Concurrent Technologies Plc or generate 15.97% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy96.72%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Concurrent Technologies Plc

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days General Motors has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's primary indicators remain very healthy which may send shares a bit higher in March 2025. The recent disarray may also be a sign of long period up-swing for the firm investors.
Concurrent Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Concurrent Technologies Plc are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, Concurrent Technologies exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

GM and Concurrent Technologies Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Concurrent Technologies

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Concurrent Technologies positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Concurrent Technologies can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Concurrent Technologies will offset losses from the drop in Concurrent Technologies' long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Concurrent Technologies Plc pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Transformation module to use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments