Correlation Between GM and Cadence Design

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Cadence Design at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Cadence Design into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Cadence Design Systems, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Cadence Design and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Cadence Design. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Cadence Design.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Cadence Design

0.69
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Cadence is 0.69. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Cadence Design Systems in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cadence Design Systems and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Cadence Design. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cadence Design Systems has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Cadence Design go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Cadence Design

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to under-perform the Cadence Design. In addition to that, GM is 1.13 times more volatile than Cadence Design Systems. It trades about -0.23 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Cadence Design Systems is currently generating about -0.03 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  29,800  in Cadence Design Systems on September 23, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (500.00) from holding Cadence Design Systems or give up 1.68% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Cadence Design Systems

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating primary indicators, GM may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Cadence Design Systems 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cadence Design Systems are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Cadence Design reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

GM and Cadence Design Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Cadence Design

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Cadence Design positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Cadence Design can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cadence Design will offset losses from the drop in Cadence Design's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Cadence Design Systems pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Competition Analyzer module to analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities.

Other Complementary Tools

Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years