Correlation Between GM and Bannerman Resources

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Bannerman Resources at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Bannerman Resources into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Bannerman Resources Limited, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Bannerman Resources and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Bannerman Resources. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Bannerman Resources.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Bannerman Resources

-0.49
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Bannerman is -0.49. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Bannerman Resources Limited in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Bannerman Resources and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Bannerman Resources. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Bannerman Resources has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Bannerman Resources go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Bannerman Resources

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon GM is expected to generate 4.22 times less return on investment than Bannerman Resources. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, General Motors is 1.72 times less risky than Bannerman Resources. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Bannerman Resources Limited is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  149.00  in Bannerman Resources Limited on September 19, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  25.00  from holding Bannerman Resources Limited or generate 16.78% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy98.46%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Bannerman Resources Limited

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy primary indicators, GM is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Bannerman Resources 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bannerman Resources Limited are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Bannerman Resources reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

GM and Bannerman Resources Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Bannerman Resources

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Bannerman Resources positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Bannerman Resources can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Bannerman Resources will offset losses from the drop in Bannerman Resources' long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Bannerman Resources Limited pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Earnings Calls module to check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules