Correlation Between GM and Bowler Metcalf
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Bowler Metcalf at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Bowler Metcalf into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Bowler Metcalf, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Bowler Metcalf and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Bowler Metcalf. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Bowler Metcalf.
Diversification Opportunities for GM and Bowler Metcalf
0.55 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between GM and Bowler is 0.55. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Bowler Metcalf in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Bowler Metcalf and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Bowler Metcalf. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Bowler Metcalf has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Bowler Metcalf go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between GM and Bowler Metcalf
Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 1.01 times more return on investment than Bowler Metcalf. However, GM is 1.01 times more volatile than Bowler Metcalf. It trades about 0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Bowler Metcalf is currently generating about 0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest 4,563 in General Motors on September 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 618.00 from holding General Motors or generate 13.54% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
General Motors vs. Bowler Metcalf
Performance |
Timeline |
General Motors |
Bowler Metcalf |
GM and Bowler Metcalf Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with GM and Bowler Metcalf
The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Bowler Metcalf positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Bowler Metcalf can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Bowler Metcalf will offset losses from the drop in Bowler Metcalf's long position.The idea behind General Motors and Bowler Metcalf pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.Bowler Metcalf vs. CA Sales Holdings | Bowler Metcalf vs. AfroCentric Investment Corp | Bowler Metcalf vs. Brimstone Investment | Bowler Metcalf vs. British American Tobacco |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.
Other Complementary Tools
Instant Ratings Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Price Ceiling Movement Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments | |
Balance Of Power Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios | |
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
CEOs Directory Screen CEOs from public companies around the world |