Correlation Between GM and Montana Technologies
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Montana Technologies at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Montana Technologies into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Montana Technologies, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Montana Technologies and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Montana Technologies. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Montana Technologies.
Diversification Opportunities for GM and Montana Technologies
0.2 | Correlation Coefficient |
Modest diversification
The 3 months correlation between GM and Montana is 0.2. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Montana Technologies in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Montana Technologies and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Montana Technologies. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Montana Technologies has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Montana Technologies go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between GM and Montana Technologies
Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon GM is expected to generate 3.22 times less return on investment than Montana Technologies. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, General Motors is 3.46 times less risky than Montana Technologies. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Montana Technologies is currently generating about 0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 133.00 in Montana Technologies on September 21, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 16.00 from holding Montana Technologies or generate 12.03% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 89.72% |
Values | Daily Returns |
General Motors vs. Montana Technologies
Performance |
Timeline |
General Motors |
Montana Technologies |
GM and Montana Technologies Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with GM and Montana Technologies
The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Montana Technologies positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Montana Technologies can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Montana Technologies will offset losses from the drop in Montana Technologies' long position.The idea behind General Motors and Montana Technologies pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.Montana Technologies vs. Quanex Building Products | Montana Technologies vs. Owens Corning | Montana Technologies vs. Trane Technologies plc | Montana Technologies vs. Fortune Brands Innovations |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stock Screener module to find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook..
Other Complementary Tools
Investing Opportunities Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences | |
Stock Tickers Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites | |
Fundamentals Comparison Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities | |
Portfolio Center All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios | |
My Watchlist Analysis Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like |