Correlation Between GM and Montana Technologies

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Montana Technologies at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Montana Technologies into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Montana Technologies, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Montana Technologies and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Montana Technologies. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Montana Technologies.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Montana Technologies

0.2
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Montana is 0.2. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Montana Technologies in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Montana Technologies and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Montana Technologies. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Montana Technologies has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Montana Technologies go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Montana Technologies

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon GM is expected to generate 3.22 times less return on investment than Montana Technologies. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, General Motors is 3.46 times less risky than Montana Technologies. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Montana Technologies is currently generating about 0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  133.00  in Montana Technologies on September 21, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  16.00  from holding Montana Technologies or generate 12.03% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy89.72%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Montana Technologies

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak primary indicators, GM may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Montana Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

24 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Montana Technologies are ranked lower than 24 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward-looking indicators, Montana Technologies showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

GM and Montana Technologies Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Montana Technologies

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Montana Technologies positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Montana Technologies can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Montana Technologies will offset losses from the drop in Montana Technologies' long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Montana Technologies pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stock Screener module to find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook..

Other Complementary Tools

Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like