Correlation Between GM and American Copper

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and American Copper at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and American Copper into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and American Copper Development, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and American Copper and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of American Copper. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and American Copper.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and American Copper

-0.6
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and American is -0.6. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and American Copper Development in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on American Copper Deve and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with American Copper. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of American Copper Deve has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and American Copper go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and American Copper

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon GM is expected to generate 8.78 times less return on investment than American Copper. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, General Motors is 9.23 times less risky than American Copper. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. American Copper Development is currently generating about 0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  6.24  in American Copper Development on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (3.91) from holding American Copper Development or give up 62.66% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy99.2%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  American Copper Development

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating primary indicators, GM displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
American Copper Deve 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in American Copper Development are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly weak basic indicators, American Copper reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

GM and American Copper Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and American Copper

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and American Copper positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, American Copper can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in American Copper will offset losses from the drop in American Copper's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and American Copper Development pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sign In To Macroaxis module to sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators