Correlation Between GM and HANetf ICAV
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and HANetf ICAV , you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and HANetf ICAV and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of HANetf ICAV. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and HANetf ICAV.
Diversification Opportunities for GM and HANetf ICAV
0.49 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between GM and HANetf is 0.49. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and HANetf ICAV in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on HANetf ICAV and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with HANetf ICAV. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of HANetf ICAV has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and HANetf ICAV go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between GM and HANetf ICAV
Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to under-perform the HANetf ICAV. In addition to that, GM is 2.32 times more volatile than HANetf ICAV . It trades about -0.12 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. HANetf ICAV is currently generating about -0.22 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 874.00 in HANetf ICAV on October 13, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (29.00) from holding HANetf ICAV or give up 3.32% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 94.74% |
Values | Daily Returns |
General Motors vs. HANetf ICAV
Performance |
Timeline |
General Motors |
HANetf ICAV |
GM and HANetf ICAV Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with GM and HANetf ICAV
The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and HANetf ICAV positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, HANetf ICAV can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in HANetf ICAV will offset losses from the drop in HANetf ICAV's long position.GM vs. Canoo Inc | GM vs. Aquagold International | GM vs. Morningstar Unconstrained Allocation | GM vs. Thrivent High Yield |
HANetf ICAV vs. UBS Fund Solutions | HANetf ICAV vs. iShares VII PLC | HANetf ICAV vs. iShares Core SP | HANetf ICAV vs. Superior Plus Corp |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Anywhere module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.
Other Complementary Tools
Commodity Directory Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges | |
Transaction History View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance | |
Odds Of Bankruptcy Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years | |
Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets | |
Pair Correlation Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments |