Correlation Between GM and Thinking Electronic

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Thinking Electronic at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Thinking Electronic into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Thinking Electronic Industrial, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Thinking Electronic and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Thinking Electronic. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Thinking Electronic.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Thinking Electronic

-0.8
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between GM and Thinking is -0.8. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Thinking Electronic Industrial in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Thinking Electronic and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Thinking Electronic. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Thinking Electronic has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Thinking Electronic go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Thinking Electronic

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to under-perform the Thinking Electronic. In addition to that, GM is 2.26 times more volatile than Thinking Electronic Industrial. It trades about -0.13 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Thinking Electronic Industrial is currently generating about -0.06 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  15,800  in Thinking Electronic Industrial on September 16, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (250.00) from holding Thinking Electronic Industrial or give up 1.58% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Thinking Electronic Industrial

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak primary indicators, GM displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Thinking Electronic 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Thinking Electronic Industrial has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest abnormal performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain stable and the latest fuss on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-term gains for the venture sophisticated investors.

GM and Thinking Electronic Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Thinking Electronic

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Thinking Electronic positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Thinking Electronic can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Thinking Electronic will offset losses from the drop in Thinking Electronic's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Thinking Electronic Industrial pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the AI Portfolio Architect module to use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated