Correlation Between GM and CSIF I
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and CSIF I Real, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and CSIF I and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of CSIF I. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and CSIF I.
Diversification Opportunities for GM and CSIF I
Significant diversification
The 3 months correlation between GM and CSIF is 0.01. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and CSIF I Real in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on CSIF I Real and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with CSIF I. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of CSIF I Real has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and CSIF I go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between GM and CSIF I
Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 3.09 times more return on investment than CSIF I. However, GM is 3.09 times more volatile than CSIF I Real. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. CSIF I Real is currently generating about 0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest 3,545 in General Motors on October 15, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 1,440 from holding General Motors or generate 40.62% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 99.19% |
Values | Daily Returns |
General Motors vs. CSIF I Real
Performance |
Timeline |
General Motors |
CSIF I Real |
GM and CSIF I Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with GM and CSIF I
The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and CSIF I positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, CSIF I can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in CSIF I will offset losses from the drop in CSIF I's long position.The idea behind General Motors and CSIF I Real pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the CEOs Directory module to screen CEOs from public companies around the world.
Other Complementary Tools
Watchlist Optimization Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm | |
Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation | |
Portfolio Holdings Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing | |
Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
Insider Screener Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance |