Correlation Between GM and Huizhou Desay
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Huizhou Desay SV, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Huizhou Desay and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Huizhou Desay. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Huizhou Desay.
Diversification Opportunities for GM and Huizhou Desay
0.4 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between GM and Huizhou is 0.4. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Huizhou Desay SV in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Huizhou Desay SV and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Huizhou Desay. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Huizhou Desay SV has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Huizhou Desay go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between GM and Huizhou Desay
Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 0.65 times more return on investment than Huizhou Desay. However, General Motors is 1.54 times less risky than Huizhou Desay. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Huizhou Desay SV is currently generating about 0.0 per unit of risk. If you would invest 3,568 in General Motors on October 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 1,417 from holding General Motors or generate 39.71% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 96.37% |
Values | Daily Returns |
General Motors vs. Huizhou Desay SV
Performance |
Timeline |
General Motors |
Huizhou Desay SV |
GM and Huizhou Desay Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with GM and Huizhou Desay
The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Huizhou Desay positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Huizhou Desay can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Huizhou Desay will offset losses from the drop in Huizhou Desay's long position.GM vs. Canoo Inc | GM vs. Aquagold International | GM vs. Morningstar Unconstrained Allocation | GM vs. Thrivent High Yield |
Huizhou Desay vs. China Satellite Communications | Huizhou Desay vs. Nanjing Putian Telecommunications | Huizhou Desay vs. Guangdong Shenglu Telecommunication | Huizhou Desay vs. Shandong Homey Aquatic |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Aroon Oscillator module to analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios.
Other Complementary Tools
Portfolio Optimization Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk | |
Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
USA ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA | |
Equity Forecasting Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum | |
Fundamental Analysis View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements |