Correlation Between Great Lakes and Limbach Holdings

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Great Lakes and Limbach Holdings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Great Lakes and Limbach Holdings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Great Lakes Dredge and Limbach Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Great Lakes and Limbach Holdings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Great Lakes with a short position of Limbach Holdings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Great Lakes and Limbach Holdings.

Diversification Opportunities for Great Lakes and Limbach Holdings

0.87
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Great and Limbach is 0.87. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Great Lakes Dredge and Limbach Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Limbach Holdings and Great Lakes is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Great Lakes Dredge are associated (or correlated) with Limbach Holdings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Limbach Holdings has no effect on the direction of Great Lakes i.e., Great Lakes and Limbach Holdings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Great Lakes and Limbach Holdings

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Great Lakes Dredge is expected to under-perform the Limbach Holdings. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Great Lakes Dredge is 1.26 times less risky than Limbach Holdings. The stock trades about -0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Limbach Holdings is currently generating about -0.02 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  8,654  in Limbach Holdings on December 28, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (1,028) from holding Limbach Holdings or give up 11.88% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Great Lakes Dredge  vs.  Limbach Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Great Lakes Dredge 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Great Lakes Dredge has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Stock's fundamental indicators remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for the firm shareholders.
Limbach Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Limbach Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest fragile performance, the Stock's primary indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the company investors.

Great Lakes and Limbach Holdings Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Great Lakes and Limbach Holdings

The main advantage of trading using opposite Great Lakes and Limbach Holdings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Great Lakes position performs unexpectedly, Limbach Holdings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Limbach Holdings will offset losses from the drop in Limbach Holdings' long position.
The idea behind Great Lakes Dredge and Limbach Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency