Correlation Between Grand Canyon and Clean Energy

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Grand Canyon and Clean Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Grand Canyon and Clean Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Grand Canyon Education and Clean Energy Fuels, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Grand Canyon and Clean Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Grand Canyon with a short position of Clean Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Grand Canyon and Clean Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Grand Canyon and Clean Energy

0.22

Correlation Coefficient

Grand Canyon  Clean Energy

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Grand and Clean is 0.22. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Grand Canyon Education and Clean Energy Fuels in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Clean Energy Fuels and Grand Canyon is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Grand Canyon Education are associated (or correlated) with Clean Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Clean Energy Fuels has no effect on the direction of Grand Canyon i.e., Grand Canyon and Clean Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Grand Canyon and Clean Energy

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Grand Canyon Education is expected to generate 0.43 times more return on investment than Clean Energy. However, Grand Canyon Education is 2.34 times less risky than Clean Energy. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Clean Energy Fuels is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  11,800  in Grand Canyon Education on October 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  4,800  from holding Grand Canyon Education or generate 40.68% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Grand Canyon Education  vs.  Clean Energy Fuels

Grand Canyon Education

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Grand Canyon Education are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively fragile basic indicators, Grand Canyon unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Clean Energy Fuels

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Clean Energy Fuels are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly unsteady basic indicators, Clean Energy may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.

Pair Trading with Grand Canyon and Clean Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Grand Canyon and Clean Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Grand Canyon position performs unexpectedly, Clean Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Clean Energy will offset losses from the drop in Clean Energy's long position.

The idea behind Grand Canyon Education and Clean Energy Fuels pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Correlation Analysis module to reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated.