Correlation Between Guggenheim Floating and Nebraska Municipal

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Guggenheim Floating and Nebraska Municipal at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Guggenheim Floating and Nebraska Municipal into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Guggenheim Floating Rate and Nebraska Municipal Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Guggenheim Floating and Nebraska Municipal and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Guggenheim Floating with a short position of Nebraska Municipal. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Guggenheim Floating and Nebraska Municipal.

Diversification Opportunities for Guggenheim Floating and Nebraska Municipal

0.34

Correlation Coefficient

Guggenheim Floating  Nebraska Municipal

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Guggenheim and Nebraska is 0.34. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Guggenheim Floating Rate and Nebraska Municipal Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Nebraska Municipal and Guggenheim Floating is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Guggenheim Floating Rate are associated (or correlated) with Nebraska Municipal. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Nebraska Municipal has no effect on the direction of Guggenheim Floating i.e., Guggenheim Floating and Nebraska Municipal go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Guggenheim Floating and Nebraska Municipal

Assuming the 90 days horizon Guggenheim Floating Rate is expected to generate 0.16 times more return on investment than Nebraska Municipal. However, Guggenheim Floating Rate is 6.37 times less risky than Nebraska Municipal. It trades about -0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Nebraska Municipal Fund is currently generating about -0.34 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,430  in Guggenheim Floating Rate on October 9, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (3.00) from holding Guggenheim Floating Rate or give up 0.12% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Guggenheim Floating Rate  vs.  Nebraska Municipal Fund

Guggenheim Floating Rate

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Guggenheim Floating Rate are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Guggenheim Floating is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Nebraska Municipal

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Nebraska Municipal Fund has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Nebraska Municipal is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Guggenheim Floating and Nebraska Municipal

The main advantage of trading using opposite Guggenheim Floating and Nebraska Municipal positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Guggenheim Floating position performs unexpectedly, Nebraska Municipal can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Nebraska Municipal will offset losses from the drop in Nebraska Municipal's long position.

The idea behind Guggenheim Floating Rate and Nebraska Municipal Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Holdings module to check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing.