Correlation Between Guardant Health and Smith Nephew

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Guardant Health and Smith Nephew at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Guardant Health and Smith Nephew into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Guardant Health and Smith Nephew SNATS, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Guardant Health and Smith Nephew and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Guardant Health with a short position of Smith Nephew. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Guardant Health and Smith Nephew.

Diversification Opportunities for Guardant Health and Smith Nephew

0.28
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Guardant and Smith is 0.28. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Guardant Health and Smith Nephew SNATS in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Smith Nephew SNATS and Guardant Health is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Guardant Health are associated (or correlated) with Smith Nephew. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Smith Nephew SNATS has no effect on the direction of Guardant Health i.e., Guardant Health and Smith Nephew go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Guardant Health and Smith Nephew

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Guardant Health is expected to generate 3.11 times more return on investment than Smith Nephew. However, Guardant Health is 3.11 times more volatile than Smith Nephew SNATS. It trades about 0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Smith Nephew SNATS is currently generating about 0.15 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,054  in Guardant Health on December 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,461  from holding Guardant Health or generate 47.84% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Guardant Health  vs.  Smith Nephew SNATS

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Guardant Health 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Guardant Health are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly weak technical indicators, Guardant Health demonstrated solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Smith Nephew SNATS 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Smith Nephew SNATS are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak basic indicators, Smith Nephew displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Guardant Health and Smith Nephew Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Guardant Health and Smith Nephew

The main advantage of trading using opposite Guardant Health and Smith Nephew positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Guardant Health position performs unexpectedly, Smith Nephew can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Smith Nephew will offset losses from the drop in Smith Nephew's long position.
The idea behind Guardant Health and Smith Nephew SNATS pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Managers module to screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments