Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Hartford Small

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Hartford Small at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Hartford Small into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Inflation and Hartford Small Pany, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Hartford Small and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Hartford Small. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Hartford Small.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Hartford Small

-0.48
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Hartford is -0.48. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Inflation and Hartford Small Pany in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Hartford Small Pany and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Inflation are associated (or correlated) with Hartford Small. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Hartford Small Pany has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Hartford Small go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Hartford Small

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs Inflation is expected to under-perform the Hartford Small. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Goldman Sachs Inflation is 4.11 times less risky than Hartford Small. The mutual fund trades about -0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Hartford Small Pany is currently generating about 0.13 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,741  in Hartford Small Pany on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  164.00  from holding Hartford Small Pany or generate 9.42% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Inflation  vs.  Hartford Small Pany

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Inflation 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Inflation has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Hartford Small Pany 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Hartford Small Pany are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Hartford Small may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Goldman Sachs and Hartford Small Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Hartford Small

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Hartford Small positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Hartford Small can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Hartford Small will offset losses from the drop in Hartford Small's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Inflation and Hartford Small Pany pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamentals Comparison module to compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges