Correlation Between Balanced Allocation and Conservative Allocation

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Balanced Allocation and Conservative Allocation at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Balanced Allocation and Conservative Allocation into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Balanced Allocation Fund and Conservative Allocation Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Balanced Allocation and Conservative Allocation and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Balanced Allocation with a short position of Conservative Allocation. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Balanced Allocation and Conservative Allocation.

Diversification Opportunities for Balanced Allocation and Conservative Allocation

0.99

Correlation Coefficient

Balanced Allocation  Conservative Allocation

No risk reduction

The 3 months correlation between Balanced and Conservative is 0.99. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Balanced Allocation Fund and Conservative Allocation Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Conservative Allocation and Balanced Allocation is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Balanced Allocation Fund are associated (or correlated) with Conservative Allocation. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Conservative Allocation has no effect on the direction of Balanced Allocation i.e., Balanced Allocation and Conservative Allocation go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Balanced Allocation and Conservative Allocation

Assuming the 90 days horizon Balanced Allocation Fund is expected to under-perform the Conservative Allocation. In addition to that, Balanced Allocation is 1.67 times more volatile than Conservative Allocation Fund. It trades about -0.02 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Conservative Allocation Fund is currently generating about -0.03 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,163  in Conservative Allocation Fund on September 16, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (3.00) from holding Conservative Allocation Fund or give up 0.26% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Strong
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Balanced Allocation Fund  vs.  Conservative Allocation Fund

Balanced Allocation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Balanced Allocation Fund are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Balanced Allocation is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Conservative Allocation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Conservative Allocation Fund has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Conservative Allocation is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Balanced Allocation and Conservative Allocation

The main advantage of trading using opposite Balanced Allocation and Conservative Allocation positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Balanced Allocation position performs unexpectedly, Conservative Allocation can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Conservative Allocation will offset losses from the drop in Conservative Allocation's long position.

The idea behind Balanced Allocation Fund and Conservative Allocation Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Rebalancing module to analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets.