Correlation Between Griffon and Royalty Management

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Griffon and Royalty Management at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Griffon and Royalty Management into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Griffon and Royalty Management Holding, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Griffon and Royalty Management and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Griffon with a short position of Royalty Management. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Griffon and Royalty Management.

Diversification Opportunities for Griffon and Royalty Management

-0.23
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Griffon and Royalty is -0.23. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Griffon and Royalty Management Holding in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Royalty Management and Griffon is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Griffon are associated (or correlated) with Royalty Management. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Royalty Management has no effect on the direction of Griffon i.e., Griffon and Royalty Management go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Griffon and Royalty Management

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Griffon is expected to generate 29.22 times less return on investment than Royalty Management. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Griffon is 11.6 times less risky than Royalty Management. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Royalty Management Holding is currently generating about 0.11 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3.40  in Royalty Management Holding on October 9, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (1.52) from holding Royalty Management Holding or give up 44.71% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy49.39%
ValuesDaily Returns

Griffon  vs.  Royalty Management Holding

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Griffon 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Griffon are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Griffon is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Royalty Management 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Royalty Management Holding are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Royalty Management showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Griffon and Royalty Management Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Griffon and Royalty Management

The main advantage of trading using opposite Griffon and Royalty Management positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Griffon position performs unexpectedly, Royalty Management can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Royalty Management will offset losses from the drop in Royalty Management's long position.
The idea behind Griffon and Royalty Management Holding pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Balance Of Power module to check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios.

Other Complementary Tools

Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device