Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Blackrock Health

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Blackrock Health at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Blackrock Health into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs International and Blackrock Health Sciences, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Blackrock Health and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Blackrock Health. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Blackrock Health.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Blackrock Health

0.87
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Blackrock is 0.87. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs International and Blackrock Health Sciences in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Blackrock Health Sciences and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs International are associated (or correlated) with Blackrock Health. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Blackrock Health Sciences has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Blackrock Health go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Blackrock Health

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs International is expected to under-perform the Blackrock Health. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Goldman Sachs International is 1.31 times less risky than Blackrock Health. The mutual fund trades about -0.3 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Blackrock Health Sciences is currently generating about -0.22 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  6,605  in Blackrock Health Sciences on October 11, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (431.00) from holding Blackrock Health Sciences or give up 6.53% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs International  vs.  Blackrock Health Sciences

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Intern 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs International has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.
Blackrock Health Sciences 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Blackrock Health Sciences has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.

Goldman Sachs and Blackrock Health Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Blackrock Health

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Blackrock Health positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Blackrock Health can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Blackrock Health will offset losses from the drop in Blackrock Health's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs International and Blackrock Health Sciences pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Anywhere module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Complementary Tools

Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets