Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Jpmorgan California

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Jpmorgan California at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Jpmorgan California into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Clean and Jpmorgan California Tax, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Jpmorgan California and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Jpmorgan California. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Jpmorgan California.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Jpmorgan California

0.21

Correlation Coefficient

Goldman Sachs  Jpmorgan California

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Jpmorgan is 0.21. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Clean and Jpmorgan California Tax in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Jpmorgan California Tax and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Clean are associated (or correlated) with Jpmorgan California. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Jpmorgan California Tax has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Jpmorgan California go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Jpmorgan California

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs Clean is expected to generate 5.29 times more return on investment than Jpmorgan California. However, Goldman Sachs is 5.29 times more volatile than Jpmorgan California Tax. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Jpmorgan California Tax is currently generating about -0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  816.00  in Goldman Sachs Clean on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  39.00  from holding Goldman Sachs Clean or generate 4.78% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Goldman Sachs Clean  vs.  Jpmorgan California Tax

Goldman Sachs Clean

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Modest

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Clean are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental drivers, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Jpmorgan California Tax

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Jpmorgan California Tax has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Jpmorgan California is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Jpmorgan California

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Jpmorgan California positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Jpmorgan California can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Jpmorgan California will offset losses from the drop in Jpmorgan California's long position.

The idea behind Goldman Sachs Clean and Jpmorgan California Tax pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Financial Widgets module to easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets.