Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Strategic Allocation

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Strategic Allocation at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Strategic Allocation into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Clean and Strategic Allocation Servative, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Strategic Allocation and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Strategic Allocation. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Strategic Allocation.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Strategic Allocation

0.32

Correlation Coefficient

Goldman Sachs  Strategic Allocation

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Strategic is 0.32. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Clean and Strategic Allocation Servative in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Strategic Allocation and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Clean are associated (or correlated) with Strategic Allocation. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Strategic Allocation has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Strategic Allocation go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Strategic Allocation

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs Clean is expected to under-perform the Strategic Allocation. In addition to that, Goldman Sachs is 1.63 times more volatile than Strategic Allocation Servative. It trades about -0.21 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Strategic Allocation Servative is currently generating about -0.12 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  573.00  in Strategic Allocation Servative on October 8, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (31.00) from holding Strategic Allocation Servative or give up 5.41% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Goldman Sachs Clean  vs.  Strategic Allocation Servative

Goldman Sachs Clean

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Clean has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Fund's fundamental drivers remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in February 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the fund investors.

Strategic Allocation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Strategic Allocation Servative has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Strategic Allocation is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Strategic Allocation

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Strategic Allocation positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Strategic Allocation can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Strategic Allocation will offset losses from the drop in Strategic Allocation's long position.

The idea behind Goldman Sachs Clean and Strategic Allocation Servative pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stocks Directory module to find actively traded stocks across global markets.