Correlation Between Glacier Bancorp and Where Food

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Glacier Bancorp and Where Food at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Glacier Bancorp and Where Food into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Glacier Bancorp and Where Food Comes, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Glacier Bancorp and Where Food and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Glacier Bancorp with a short position of Where Food. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Glacier Bancorp and Where Food.

Diversification Opportunities for Glacier Bancorp and Where Food

0.5
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Glacier and Where is 0.5. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Glacier Bancorp and Where Food Comes in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Where Food Comes and Glacier Bancorp is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Glacier Bancorp are associated (or correlated) with Where Food. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Where Food Comes has no effect on the direction of Glacier Bancorp i.e., Glacier Bancorp and Where Food go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Glacier Bancorp and Where Food

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Glacier Bancorp is expected to generate 1.38 times less return on investment than Where Food. In addition to that, Glacier Bancorp is 1.18 times more volatile than Where Food Comes. It trades about 0.1 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Where Food Comes is currently generating about 0.16 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,078  in Where Food Comes on September 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  217.00  from holding Where Food Comes or generate 20.13% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Glacier Bancorp  vs.  Where Food Comes

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Glacier Bancorp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Glacier Bancorp are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly fragile fundamental indicators, Glacier Bancorp demonstrated solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Where Food Comes 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Where Food Comes are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile fundamental indicators, Where Food reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Glacier Bancorp and Where Food Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Glacier Bancorp and Where Food

The main advantage of trading using opposite Glacier Bancorp and Where Food positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Glacier Bancorp position performs unexpectedly, Where Food can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Where Food will offset losses from the drop in Where Food's long position.
The idea behind Glacier Bancorp and Where Food Comes pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Diagnostics module to use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings.

Other Complementary Tools

Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets