Correlation Between Games Workshop and Science In

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Games Workshop and Science In at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Games Workshop and Science In into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Games Workshop Group and Science in Sport, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Games Workshop and Science In and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Games Workshop with a short position of Science In. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Games Workshop and Science In.

Diversification Opportunities for Games Workshop and Science In

0.47

Correlation Coefficient

Games Workshop  Science In

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Games and Science is 0.47. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Games Workshop Group and Science in Sport in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Science in Sport and Games Workshop is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Games Workshop Group are associated (or correlated) with Science In. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Science in Sport has no effect on the direction of Games Workshop i.e., Games Workshop and Science In go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Games Workshop and Science In

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Games Workshop Group is expected to generate 1.02 times more return on investment than Science In. However, Games Workshop is 1.02 times more volatile than Science in Sport. It trades about 0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Science in Sport is currently generating about 0.1 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,284,791  in Games Workshop Group on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  125,209  from holding Games Workshop Group or generate 9.75% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Games Workshop Group  vs.  Science in Sport

Games Workshop Group

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Games Workshop Group are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady technical and fundamental indicators, Games Workshop may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in April 2025.

Science in Sport

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Science in Sport are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, Science In may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in April 2025.

Pair Trading with Games Workshop and Science In

The main advantage of trading using opposite Games Workshop and Science In positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Games Workshop position performs unexpectedly, Science In can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Science In will offset losses from the drop in Science In's long position.

The idea behind Games Workshop Group and Science in Sport pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Watchlist Optimization module to optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm.