Correlation Between GameSquare Holdings and Snail,

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GameSquare Holdings and Snail, at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GameSquare Holdings and Snail, into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between GameSquare Holdings and Snail, Class A, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GameSquare Holdings and Snail, and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GameSquare Holdings with a short position of Snail,. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GameSquare Holdings and Snail,.

Diversification Opportunities for GameSquare Holdings and Snail,

0.63
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between GameSquare and Snail, is 0.63. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding GameSquare Holdings and Snail, Class A in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Snail, Class A and GameSquare Holdings is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on GameSquare Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Snail,. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Snail, Class A has no effect on the direction of GameSquare Holdings i.e., GameSquare Holdings and Snail, go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GameSquare Holdings and Snail,

Given the investment horizon of 90 days GameSquare Holdings is expected to generate 0.56 times more return on investment than Snail,. However, GameSquare Holdings is 1.77 times less risky than Snail,. It trades about -0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Snail, Class A is currently generating about -0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  82.00  in GameSquare Holdings on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (20.00) from holding GameSquare Holdings or give up 24.39% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

GameSquare Holdings  vs.  Snail, Class A

 Performance 
       Timeline  
GameSquare Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days GameSquare Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of inconsistent performance in the last few months, the Stock's primary indicators remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for the firm shareholders.
Snail, Class A 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Snail, Class A has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain quite persistent which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The latest mess may also be a sign of long-standing up-swing for the company institutional investors.

GameSquare Holdings and Snail, Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GameSquare Holdings and Snail,

The main advantage of trading using opposite GameSquare Holdings and Snail, positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GameSquare Holdings position performs unexpectedly, Snail, can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Snail, will offset losses from the drop in Snail,'s long position.
The idea behind GameSquare Holdings and Snail, Class A pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm