Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Clearbridge Energy

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Clearbridge Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Clearbridge Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Dynamic and Clearbridge Energy Mlp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Clearbridge Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Clearbridge Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Clearbridge Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Clearbridge Energy

0.18

Correlation Coefficient

Goldman Sachs  Clearbridge Energy

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Clearbridge is 0.18. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Dynamic and Clearbridge Energy Mlp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Clearbridge Energy Mlp and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Dynamic are associated (or correlated) with Clearbridge Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Clearbridge Energy Mlp has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Clearbridge Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Clearbridge Energy

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs is expected to generate 8.48 times less return on investment than Clearbridge Energy. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Goldman Sachs Dynamic is 7.37 times less risky than Clearbridge Energy. It trades about 0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Clearbridge Energy Mlp is currently generating about 0.1 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  5,169  in Clearbridge Energy Mlp on December 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  422.00  from holding Clearbridge Energy Mlp or generate 8.16% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Goldman Sachs Dynamic  vs.  Clearbridge Energy Mlp

Goldman Sachs Dynamic

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Modest

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Dynamic are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Clearbridge Energy Mlp

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Clearbridge Energy Mlp are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Clearbridge Energy may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in April 2025.

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Clearbridge Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Clearbridge Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Clearbridge Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Clearbridge Energy will offset losses from the drop in Clearbridge Energy's long position.

The idea behind Goldman Sachs Dynamic and Clearbridge Energy Mlp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Transaction History module to view history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance.