Correlation Between Fidelity Strategic and Fidelity Advisor

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Fidelity Strategic and Fidelity Advisor at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Fidelity Strategic and Fidelity Advisor into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Fidelity Strategic Dividend and Fidelity Advisor Balanced, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Fidelity Strategic and Fidelity Advisor and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Fidelity Strategic with a short position of Fidelity Advisor. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Fidelity Strategic and Fidelity Advisor.

Diversification Opportunities for Fidelity Strategic and Fidelity Advisor

0.58
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Fidelity and Fidelity is 0.58. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Fidelity Strategic Dividend and Fidelity Advisor Balanced in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fidelity Advisor Balanced and Fidelity Strategic is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Fidelity Strategic Dividend are associated (or correlated) with Fidelity Advisor. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fidelity Advisor Balanced has no effect on the direction of Fidelity Strategic i.e., Fidelity Strategic and Fidelity Advisor go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Fidelity Strategic and Fidelity Advisor

Assuming the 90 days horizon Fidelity Strategic is expected to generate 1.1 times less return on investment than Fidelity Advisor. In addition to that, Fidelity Strategic is 1.54 times more volatile than Fidelity Advisor Balanced. It trades about 0.04 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Fidelity Advisor Balanced is currently generating about 0.07 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  2,965  in Fidelity Advisor Balanced on September 14, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  36.00  from holding Fidelity Advisor Balanced or generate 1.21% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy98.44%
ValuesDaily Returns

Fidelity Strategic Dividend  vs.  Fidelity Advisor Balanced

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Fidelity Strategic 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fidelity Strategic Dividend are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Fidelity Strategic is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Fidelity Advisor Balanced 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fidelity Advisor Balanced are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Fidelity Advisor is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Fidelity Strategic and Fidelity Advisor Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Fidelity Strategic and Fidelity Advisor

The main advantage of trading using opposite Fidelity Strategic and Fidelity Advisor positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Fidelity Strategic position performs unexpectedly, Fidelity Advisor can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fidelity Advisor will offset losses from the drop in Fidelity Advisor's long position.
The idea behind Fidelity Strategic Dividend and Fidelity Advisor Balanced pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Odds Of Bankruptcy module to get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years.

Other Complementary Tools

Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk