Correlation Between FitLife Brands, and Universal Music

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both FitLife Brands, and Universal Music at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining FitLife Brands, and Universal Music into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between FitLife Brands, Common and Universal Music Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on FitLife Brands, and Universal Music and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in FitLife Brands, with a short position of Universal Music. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of FitLife Brands, and Universal Music.

Diversification Opportunities for FitLife Brands, and Universal Music

-0.44
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between FitLife and Universal is -0.44. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding FitLife Brands, Common and Universal Music Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Universal Music Group and FitLife Brands, is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on FitLife Brands, Common are associated (or correlated) with Universal Music. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Universal Music Group has no effect on the direction of FitLife Brands, i.e., FitLife Brands, and Universal Music go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between FitLife Brands, and Universal Music

Given the investment horizon of 90 days FitLife Brands, Common is expected to under-perform the Universal Music. In addition to that, FitLife Brands, is 1.14 times more volatile than Universal Music Group. It trades about -0.16 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Universal Music Group is currently generating about 0.08 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  2,511  in Universal Music Group on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  272.00  from holding Universal Music Group or generate 10.83% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

FitLife Brands, Common  vs.  Universal Music Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
FitLife Brands, Common 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days FitLife Brands, Common has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Stock's essential indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.
Universal Music Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Modest

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Universal Music Group are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Universal Music may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in April 2025.

FitLife Brands, and Universal Music Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with FitLife Brands, and Universal Music

The main advantage of trading using opposite FitLife Brands, and Universal Music positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if FitLife Brands, position performs unexpectedly, Universal Music can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Universal Music will offset losses from the drop in Universal Music's long position.
The idea behind FitLife Brands, Common and Universal Music Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Content Syndication module to quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal.

Other Complementary Tools

Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals