Correlation Between FitLife Brands, and Scholastic

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both FitLife Brands, and Scholastic at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining FitLife Brands, and Scholastic into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between FitLife Brands, Common and Scholastic, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on FitLife Brands, and Scholastic and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in FitLife Brands, with a short position of Scholastic. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of FitLife Brands, and Scholastic.

Diversification Opportunities for FitLife Brands, and Scholastic

0.56
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between FitLife and Scholastic is 0.56. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding FitLife Brands, Common and Scholastic in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Scholastic and FitLife Brands, is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on FitLife Brands, Common are associated (or correlated) with Scholastic. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Scholastic has no effect on the direction of FitLife Brands, i.e., FitLife Brands, and Scholastic go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between FitLife Brands, and Scholastic

Given the investment horizon of 90 days FitLife Brands, Common is expected to under-perform the Scholastic. In addition to that, FitLife Brands, is 1.41 times more volatile than Scholastic. It trades about -0.07 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Scholastic is currently generating about 0.0 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  2,664  in Scholastic on September 10, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (7.00) from holding Scholastic or give up 0.26% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy95.24%
ValuesDaily Returns

FitLife Brands, Common  vs.  Scholastic

 Performance 
       Timeline  
FitLife Brands, Common 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days FitLife Brands, Common has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable essential indicators, FitLife Brands, is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Scholastic 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Scholastic has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest uncertain performance, the Stock's technical indicators remain persistent and the latest mess on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-standing gains for the company institutional investors.

FitLife Brands, and Scholastic Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with FitLife Brands, and Scholastic

The main advantage of trading using opposite FitLife Brands, and Scholastic positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if FitLife Brands, position performs unexpectedly, Scholastic can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Scholastic will offset losses from the drop in Scholastic's long position.
The idea behind FitLife Brands, Common and Scholastic pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Commodity Channel module to use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum.

Other Complementary Tools

Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance