Correlation Between FitLife Brands, and Rocky Mountain

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both FitLife Brands, and Rocky Mountain at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining FitLife Brands, and Rocky Mountain into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between FitLife Brands, Common and Rocky Mountain Chocolate, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on FitLife Brands, and Rocky Mountain and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in FitLife Brands, with a short position of Rocky Mountain. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of FitLife Brands, and Rocky Mountain.

Diversification Opportunities for FitLife Brands, and Rocky Mountain

0.65

Correlation Coefficient

FitLife Brands,  Rocky Mountain

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between FitLife and Rocky is 0.65. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding FitLife Brands, Common and Rocky Mountain Chocolate in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Rocky Mountain Chocolate and FitLife Brands, is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on FitLife Brands, Common are associated (or correlated) with Rocky Mountain. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Rocky Mountain Chocolate has no effect on the direction of FitLife Brands, i.e., FitLife Brands, and Rocky Mountain go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between FitLife Brands, and Rocky Mountain

Given the investment horizon of 90 days FitLife Brands, Common is expected to generate 0.58 times more return on investment than Rocky Mountain. However, FitLife Brands, Common is 1.72 times less risky than Rocky Mountain. It trades about -0.14 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Rocky Mountain Chocolate is currently generating about -0.2 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,647  in FitLife Brands, Common on December 19, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (336.00) from holding FitLife Brands, Common or give up 20.4% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	98.33%
Values	Daily Returns

FitLife Brands, Common  vs.  Rocky Mountain Chocolate

FitLife Brands, Common

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days FitLife Brands, Common has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Stock's essential indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.

Rocky Mountain Chocolate

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Rocky Mountain Chocolate has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's fundamental indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.

Pair Trading with FitLife Brands, and Rocky Mountain

The main advantage of trading using opposite FitLife Brands, and Rocky Mountain positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if FitLife Brands, position performs unexpectedly, Rocky Mountain can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Rocky Mountain will offset losses from the drop in Rocky Mountain's long position.

The idea behind FitLife Brands, Common and Rocky Mountain Chocolate pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.