Correlation Between FitLife Brands, and PennantPark Investment

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both FitLife Brands, and PennantPark Investment at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining FitLife Brands, and PennantPark Investment into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between FitLife Brands, Common and PennantPark Investment, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on FitLife Brands, and PennantPark Investment and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in FitLife Brands, with a short position of PennantPark Investment. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of FitLife Brands, and PennantPark Investment.

Diversification Opportunities for FitLife Brands, and PennantPark Investment

-0.29

Correlation Coefficient

FitLife Brands,  PennantPark Investment

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between FitLife and PennantPark is -0.29. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding FitLife Brands, Common and PennantPark Investment in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on PennantPark Investment and FitLife Brands, is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on FitLife Brands, Common are associated (or correlated) with PennantPark Investment. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of PennantPark Investment has no effect on the direction of FitLife Brands, i.e., FitLife Brands, and PennantPark Investment go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between FitLife Brands, and PennantPark Investment

Given the investment horizon of 90 days FitLife Brands, is expected to generate 50.8 times less return on investment than PennantPark Investment. In addition to that, FitLife Brands, is 2.6 times more volatile than PennantPark Investment. It trades about 0.0 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. PennantPark Investment is currently generating about 0.09 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  664.00  in PennantPark Investment on September 6, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  14.00  from holding PennantPark Investment or generate 2.11% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

FitLife Brands, Common  vs.  PennantPark Investment

FitLife Brands, Common

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days FitLife Brands, Common has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable essential indicators, FitLife Brands, is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

PennantPark Investment

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in PennantPark Investment are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, PennantPark Investment is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Pair Trading with FitLife Brands, and PennantPark Investment

The main advantage of trading using opposite FitLife Brands, and PennantPark Investment positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if FitLife Brands, position performs unexpectedly, PennantPark Investment can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in PennantPark Investment will offset losses from the drop in PennantPark Investment's long position.

The idea behind FitLife Brands, Common and PennantPark Investment pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Options Analysis module to analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios.