Correlation Between First Ship and KINDER
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between First Ship Lease and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on First Ship and KINDER and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in First Ship with a short position of KINDER. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of First Ship and KINDER.
Diversification Opportunities for First Ship and KINDER
0.0 | Correlation Coefficient |
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between First and KINDER is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding First Ship Lease and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on KINDER MORGAN ENERGY and First Ship is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on First Ship Lease are associated (or correlated) with KINDER. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of KINDER MORGAN ENERGY has no effect on the direction of First Ship i.e., First Ship and KINDER go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between First Ship and KINDER
Assuming the 90 days horizon First Ship is expected to generate 49.2 times less return on investment than KINDER. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, First Ship Lease is 30.31 times less risky than KINDER. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. KINDER MORGAN ENERGY is currently generating about 0.07 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 11,477 in KINDER MORGAN ENERGY on October 24, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (618.00) from holding KINDER MORGAN ENERGY or give up 5.38% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Flat |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 91.33% |
Values | Daily Returns |
First Ship Lease vs. KINDER MORGAN ENERGY
Performance |
Timeline |
First Ship Lease |
KINDER MORGAN ENERGY |
First Ship and KINDER Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with First Ship and KINDER
The main advantage of trading using opposite First Ship and KINDER positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if First Ship position performs unexpectedly, KINDER can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in KINDER will offset losses from the drop in KINDER's long position.First Ship vs. BRP Inc | First Ship vs. CenterPoint Energy | First Ship vs. Transportadora de Gas | First Ship vs. U Power Limited |
KINDER vs. AEP TEX INC | KINDER vs. US BANK NATIONAL | KINDER vs. BlueLinx Holdings | KINDER vs. Texas Pacific Land |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Commodity Channel module to use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum.
Other Complementary Tools
Bonds Directory Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies | |
ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world | |
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
Aroon Oscillator Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios | |
Transaction History View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance |