Correlation Between Frontera and China Food
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Frontera and China Food at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Frontera and China Food into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Frontera Group and China Food and, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Frontera and China Food and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Frontera with a short position of China Food. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Frontera and China Food.
Diversification Opportunities for Frontera and China Food
0.0 | Correlation Coefficient |
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between Frontera and China is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Frontera Group and China Food and in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on China Food and Frontera is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Frontera Group are associated (or correlated) with China Food. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of China Food has no effect on the direction of Frontera i.e., Frontera and China Food go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Frontera and China Food
If you would invest 1.68 in China Food and on October 10, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 0.02 from holding China Food and or generate 1.19% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Flat |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 95.12% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Frontera Group vs. China Food and
Performance |
Timeline |
Frontera Group |
China Food |
Frontera and China Food Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Frontera and China Food
The main advantage of trading using opposite Frontera and China Food positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Frontera position performs unexpectedly, China Food can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in China Food will offset losses from the drop in China Food's long position.Frontera vs. XCPCNL Business Services | Frontera vs. International Consolidated Companies | Frontera vs. Global Payments | Frontera vs. Mills Music Trust |
China Food vs. International Consolidated Companies | China Food vs. Frontera Group | China Food vs. XCPCNL Business Services | China Food vs. Aramark Holdings |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Dashboard module to portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments.
Other Complementary Tools
Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated | |
ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world | |
Fundamental Analysis View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements | |
Portfolio Holdings Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing | |
Pair Correlation Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments |